• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Firing

Older worker slows down: Does firing = bias?

05/21/2013

When older employees hear the word “slow,” they may immediately assume that’s a code word for “old.” But sometimes, slow just means slow. If you have workers who can’t meet the job’s re­­quired—and preferably written—performance standards, you don’t have to keep them on staff, regardless of their ages.

Get details if several workers break same rule

05/17/2013
You have no doubt heard that em­ployees who break the same rule should receive the same punishment. That’s true in most circumstances. However, nothing prevents employers from treating similarly situated employees differently if the facts warrant it. In those cases, however, details matter.

Failing to pay workers on time may cost you a big penalty

05/09/2013
In Minnesota, employees are supposed to be paid promptly and receive an accounting of their time worked. Failure to comply may mean you’ll have to pay a penalty.

Firing because you suspect thievery: Better be prepared to prove it

05/09/2013
Employees who steal from their employers violate their duty of loyalty. That makes them ineligible for unemployment compensation. That’s true even if the theft is small. But you must be prepared with clear testimony if you want to contest the worker’s right to unemployment benefits.

2 workers broke same rule? Explain different punishments

05/07/2013
Sometimes, two employees who break the same rule don’t deserve exactly the same punishment. But employers must make sure they can explain the difference.

Off-limits to bosses: Talk of child-rearing

05/06/2013
Some things are best left unsaid. That includes any comments about how hard it must be for a mother to have a career and raise children. Tell managers to keep the topic out of their office chitchat.

Disabled employee always calling in sick?

05/01/2013
Disabled employees may be en­­titled to some time off as an accommodation, but there are limits. If an employee is constantly absent when his disability makes it impossible to work, you may be able to discharge him. That’s because attendance can be an essential function of a job—and constantly missing work may show that the employee can’t perform that essential function.

Employee out for one day probably ineligible for FMLA

04/30/2013
It’s OK to fire someone whose medical problems clearly don’t qualify as a serious health condition under the FMLA.

OK to punish repeat offenders more harshly

04/30/2013
A cardinal HR rule: Everyone who breaks the same rule should receive the same punishment. That doesn’t mean a frequent rule-breaker can’t be punished more harshly.

FMLA leave inconvenient? Too bad! That’s no excuse for termination

04/30/2013
It can be frustrating to deal with an employee who has constant attendance problems. But if that employee has a serious health condition entitling him to FMLA leave, there’s really nothing you can do, no matter how inconvenient and disruptive his absences are.