• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

HR Management

The HR I.Q. Test: May ’09

04/17/2009

Test your knowledge of recent trends in employment law, comp & benefits and other HR issues with our monthly mini-quiz …

Study: When workers leave, so does company data

04/17/2009

More than half of employees (59%) who lost or left their jobs in 2008 took company data with them, according to a study by Symantec and the Ponemon Institute. Of those who admitted taking data, 61% had an unfavorable view of their former employers.

Secretly recording co-workers: A firing offense?

04/17/2009

Q. Some employees discovered that a co-worker has been secretly recording conversations with them and a supervisor. They’re complaining about the invasion of privacy. The company president’s first reaction was to have the employee arrested, but I’m not sure he broke any laws. Should we contact police?

Ignore privacy protests: You can review detailed call records from company cell phones

04/17/2009

Steelcase Inc. gave employee Patrick Morrissey two cell phones: one for business and one for personal use. Both billing statements went to his boss because Steelcase paid both bills. But the boss confronted Morrissey when he reviewed the bills and noticed Morrissey had made personal calls on company time …

Defend against retaliation claims: Good records can stop whistle-blower complaints

04/17/2009

Whistle-blowing employees almost always expect to experience retaliation. They start looking for it as soon as they file a complaint or bring a safety issue to their employers’ attention. Smart employers anticipate this and make absolutely sure that any discipline, layoff or other adverse employment action is wholly justified before they implement it.

Good news: Former employees can’t just keep filing lawsuits

04/17/2009

Here’s some encouraging news for employers. Courts are cracking down on employees who file seemingly never-ending successions of lawsuits. They’re dismissing such suits fast. But a court can do so only if you let it know that the former employee has already filed (and lost or won) a previous round of litigation.

Consent doesn’t mean it wasn’t harassment

04/14/2009

Employers sometimes mistakenly believe that consensual sexual activity between a subordinate and a supervisor isn’t sexual harassment. That’s simply not the case. As long as the activity was unwelcome, it doesn’t matter if the employee being targeted agreed to the supervisor’s demands. Fear or threats of losing one’s job can be enough to force an employee to “consent.”

Assessing witness credibility in workplace investigations

04/14/2009

During a workplace investigation, you, as an HR investigator, can take a number of practical steps to improve the reliability and objectivity of your witness credibility assessments. Four factors are critical to assessing witness credibility: demeanor, consistency, chronology, and past history and motivations.

Set policies, establish clear process for employees to report sexual harassment

04/14/2009

It’s been many years since a big sexual harassment case hit the Supreme Court. That’s no reason for employers to rest easy. Regularly review your sexual harassment policy to make sure it’s doing what it should do. Don’t forget to train new managers and supervisors on how to handle complaints, especially those who have recently been promoted from lower-ranking positions.

Can we ban nurses from wearing protest buttons—without violating the NLRA?

04/14/2009

Q. Some of the nurses at our hospital have started wearing union buttons that state, “Nurses Demand Safe Staffing.” If the hospital administrators ban the buttons, will the hospital have committed an unfair labor practice?