• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retaliation

Make sure managers know laws against employee discrimination

10/12/2010

Last year, U.S. employees filed the second highest number of EEOC complaints claiming they suffered discrimination at work. You know that U.S. anti-discrimination laws require treating all applicants and employees equally. But do your organization’s supervisors understand the relevant laws? Pass along this primer on federal anti-bias laws to make sure your compliance efforts start right on the front line.

Casual question about bias isn’t protected activity

10/12/2010
Can a simple inquiry about discrimination become the basis for a lawsuit? No, according to the 11th Circuit.

Handle firing with care if employee has complained about alleged corporate wrongdoing

10/12/2010

Employers that want to terminate employees who have complained about pressure to engage in criminal activity must make sure the termination process is flawless. It’s especially important to be able to articulate in very concrete terms an underlying, legitimate reason for the firing—one that can’t be mistaken as a pretext for getting rid of a troublemaker.

Federal court makes it tougher for employees to prove retaliation

10/12/2010

Federal courts often use the well-known McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test to determine whether an employer has unlawfully discriminated against an employee. Now the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that when it considers an Illinois workers’ compensation retaliation claim, it must apply an Illinois state law rule that is more demanding for employees than the McDonnell Douglas test.

Northbrook temp agency settles race bias suit

10/12/2010

Northbrook-based temp agency Paramount Staffing has agreed to settle a race and national-origin bias suit resulting from actions occurring at its Memphis office. The suit alleged Paramount refused to hire black applicants for warehouse positions, instead filling all the spots with Hispanic workers.

Transferring an employee may be retaliation, but merely discussing a transfer isn’t

10/12/2010

Retaliation is anything that would dissuade a reasonable employee from complaining about discrimination in the first place. That’s not to say every little negative thing that happens following a discrimination complaint is retaliation. Take, for example, a transfer to another position or shift.

When push comes to shove, no retaliation unless protected right was violated first

10/07/2010

Employees who complain about alleged discrimination or harassment that violates Title VII or other anti-discrimination laws are protected from retaliation for reporting their allegations. But that doesn’t automatically mean every complaint about workplace problems is protected. If the complaint doesn’t touch on clearly identifiable workplace rights, it’s just a complaint.

Pay cut? Beware constructive discharge claim

10/07/2010

Can an employee you never fired sue you for a discriminatory termination? Oddly enough, yes. Under some circumstances, an employee can quit and claim she was “constructively discharged.” To do so, she has to show conditions at work were intolerable. And now a federal court has concluded that cutting someone’s pay can be an intolerable condition.

Jailhouse sex, alleged pay-back lead to lawsuit in Caldwell

10/04/2010

A former Caldwell County corrections officer has filed a discrimination and whistle-blower lawsuit claiming that she lost her job after telling a supervisor she had seen two co-workers having sex in the county jail. Her lawsuit claims her subsequent demotion and termination were in retaliation for her report.

Irony: Houston Buick dealer faces age bias suit

10/04/2010

A Houston car dealer specializing in selling Buicks—traditionally the General Motors’ brand aimed at older car buyers—is facing an age discrimination and retaliation suit. Mark Theodoridis, Gay Buick GMC’s fleet and credit union manager for 11 years, alleges that he was constantly harassed and discriminated against on the basis of his age.