• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retaliation

Vague ‘unfairness’ complaints aren’t protected activity

02/02/2011
Before an employee can claim his employer retaliated, he has to show he engaged in a protected activity. But vague claims aren’t enough.

Arbitrators can decide post-termination retaliation

02/02/2011
Good news if you use arbitration agreements: They apply to former employees who claim retaliation based on protected activity. The potential result: You’re less likely to wind up defending a lawsuit in federal court.

Protect against retaliation suits by conducting independent and ‘blind’ internal investigations

02/02/2011

Employers can’t punish employees for complaining about alleged discrimination or harassment. That’s true even if the complaint doesn’t pan out, as long as the employees complained in good faith. But judges don’t want employees to use the threat of a retaliation lawsuit as a way to circumvent fair discipline, either. There’s a way for employers to get judges on their side.

Supreme Court expands retaliation prohibitions

02/02/2011
Employers everywhere must be extra cautious about discipline that could be construed as retaliation now that the U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously affirmed that the fiancé of a woman who filed an EEOC discrimination complaint was protected from retaliation by their mutual employer.

Don’t shoot messenger when you uncover possible bias

01/28/2011
Employees who provide information about possible discrimination to the EEOC are protected from retaliation for doing so. Courts generally protect the EEOC’s ability to conduct investigations. They don’t like to see cooperating employees discouraged from answering questions.

Give managers a refresher on retaliation risks

01/27/2011
Employee claims of job discrimination to the EEOC spiked above 99,000 last year, the highest total ever. On Jan. 11, the EEOC released more details, and those numbers yield three important lessons for employers:

Supreme Court: Fiancé of complaining worker has retaliation protection

01/25/2011
The Supreme Court on Jan. 24 ruled that the fiancé of a woman who filed an EEOC discrimination complaint was protected from retaliation by their mutual employer and can now sue for retaliation. The case has important implications for all employers: It’s more important than ever to make sure your discipline policies pass the no-retaliation test.

Track potential disciplinary problems as they occur

01/21/2011
For most problem employees, deteriorating behavior and performance is a gradual process. Smart employers track the downward trajectory along the way.

After employee has complained, be prepared to defend even minor work changes

01/21/2011
Employers can defend against alleged retaliation by showing they had a good reason for the adverse action. For example, if a supervisor moves an employee to another position for a legitimate management reason, that’s not retaliation. Consider the following case.

When deciding on employee discipline, you don’t have to be absolutely right–just fair

01/21/2011

Supervisors have to make decisions on how to run the workplace every day. They can’t spend hours deliberating every move. Imagine how little actual work would get done if supervisors had to double-check every decision to make absolutely sure it was correct. Fortunately, courts don’t require perfection from employers—just assurance that they acted fairly and in good faith.