• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retaliation

Supreme Court to decide three employment law cases in ’08-’09 session

10/08/2008

The U.S. Supreme Court opens its 2008-2009 session with three employment law cases on its docket. Last session, the court expanded employees’ rights to claim retaliation under federal anti-discrimination law. This year, one Supreme Court case deals with retaliation, while two others address discrimination.

Investigate, follow up on all harassment cases

10/08/2008

Employees who complain about sexual or other kinds of harassment shouldn’t be left to wonder whether their complaints are being investigated. Employers should apply sound investigation procedures and then follow up with the employee who came forward to let her know the result. That’s true even if the company isn’t going to take any action …

No kid gloves needed: Discipline OK after employee complains

10/08/2008

Employees who complain about harassment or discrimination often mistakenly believe they are automatically protected from discipline. They’ve heard employers can’t “retaliate” against them for complaining. That’s true to a point. But that doesn’t mean that those employees get automatic immunity from any pre-existing workplace performance or behavior problems …

Retaliation can happen even in flimsy harassment case

10/08/2008

Employees don’t have to win their sexual harassment claims to prove retaliation. They merely have to show they were concerned that they might have experienced harassment …

Don’t fall into post-complaint retaliation trap

10/07/2008

Employees who file discrimination complaints are protected from retaliation. That doesn’t mean they’re immune from being punished if they break rules. Employers can and should take appropriate disciplinary action against them. The key is a careful and deliberate approach, devoid of emotion …

Track discipline to avoid retaliation against worker who charged discrimination

10/07/2008

It sometimes feels ominous when an employee accuses the company or a supervisor of discrimination and takes a complaint to the EEOC or some other agency. But those cases often reach settlement before they get out of hand. Then everyone has to get along, especially if the settlement includes reinstating the employee. HR should take the lead in making sure a potentially awkward situation works smoothly.

Gristede’s finds you can’t have it both ways on FLSA

10/01/2008

A class of more than 400 current and former managers at Gristede’s grocery stores won summary judgment in federal court on claims that the New York City chain violated the FLSA by treating them as both salaried and hourly employees …

Lawsuit brewing? Think twice before destroying documents

09/26/2008

When discrimination charges go to court, both sides are entitled to copies of all relevant evidence. That includes memos, notes and e-mail (with some exceptions for confidential, trade secret or attorney-client privileged communications). Don’t think you’ll be able to avoid liability by getting rid of some documents …

REDA provides whistle-blower protection during some internal investigations, too

09/26/2008

Until recently, it was unclear whether reporting unsafe or illegal working conditions to an internal auditor or another responsible party was “protected activity” under the North Carolina Retaliatory Employment Discrimination Act (REDA). Now a federal court has decided that REDA may cover internal reports …

Good news: EEPA does not include retaliation claims

09/26/2008

North Carolina employers have one less thing to worry about: A federal trial court recently decided the North Carolina Equal Employment Practices Act (EEPA) does not allow employees to file separate retaliation claims on top of initial discrimination complaints …