• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

Remind bosses: Reference check calls go to HR

03/01/2011
If your managers and supervisors respond to reference calls by offering negative information, a lawsuit is probably coming. One reason: A whole new industry has emerged to help former employees find out what their old bosses are saying about them. That makes it more important than ever to refer all reference check calls to HR.

High court opens door to ‘third party’ retaliation

03/01/2011
The U.S. Supreme Court last month widened the circle of people who can bring retaliation lawsuits under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. As a result, HR and supervisors everywhere must be extra cautious about handing out discipline or terminations that could be construed as some sort of retaliation.

Sample Policy: Harassment

02/28/2011
Login Email Address Password I forgot my password To continue reading this page, become an HR Specialist Premium Plus member today! Your subscription includes: Ask the Attorney: Answers to your HR legal questions Compliance Guidance: Access to 7,000 HR news articles, updated daily, sorted by state State-by-State: Summaries of HR laws in all 50 states […]

Durham testing company settles religious bias lawsuit

02/28/2011

Durham-based educational testing firm Measurement Inc. has agreed to pay $110,000 to settle an EEOC religious discrimination suit filed on behalf of a former employee who belongs to a Christian denomination known as the Children of Yisrael.

Severance agreement holds up, despite unusual promise

02/28/2011
Finally, some good news for employers! A severance agreement that releases all claims against the employer will likely be enforceable in North Carolina, even if the employee claims her supervisor promised other benefits.

Warn bosses: Talk of protected characteristics can flag bias

02/28/2011
Here’s a warning you should make sure supervisors hear loud and clear: No one in management should ever mention a protected characteristic (such as age, race or gender) while discussing a promotion or hiring decision.

Not everyone wears a halo: Courts don’t expect perfect work environment

02/28/2011
Some employees act like they expect everyone at work to be on their best behavior all the time, never doing or saying anything even mildly offensive. That’s just not realistic.

Veteran complaining of USERRA violation? Don’t even think about using that against him

02/28/2011

It’s often easy for employees to prove retaliation than whatever alleged bias may have preceded the retaliation. For cases involving employees who are also members of the armed forces, it’s even easier. They’re protected by USERRA.

Beware racial slurs–no matter the context

02/28/2011
Some employees will make any argument to win a lawsuit. Fortunately, courts usually can spot a set-up when they see one.

Can we make direct deposit mandatory?

02/28/2011
Q. Can a business require employees to use direct deposit to receive their pay?