• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

Let investigation guide harassment punishment

06/17/2011

Not every workplace incident involving offensive conduct between employees has to end in termination. Employers can and should base their response on the circumstances uncovered during an investigation. For example, the first time an employee uses offensive language, the appropriate remedy may be a stern warning. On other occasions, when it’s impossible to tell who said what, the proper response may be to counsel both parties.

Is Brooklyn Botanical Gardens fertile ground for bias?

06/17/2011
The former head of security at the Brooklyn Botanical Gardens has filed a lawsuit claiming the institution discriminates against blacks, and that he was fired in part because of his age.

Dunkin’ Donuts store pays for not investigating harassment

06/17/2011
The owner of a Dunkin’ Donuts franchise will pay $290,000 and agree to enter into a six-year settlement agreement after it refused to investigate charges that the store manager was sexually harassing female workers. Many of the employees were just 16 and 17 years old at the time.

When workplace romance goes bad, fall back on sexual harassment policy for discipline

06/17/2011

It’s bound to happen eventually: Two of your employees will have an affair. Then one of them will break it off, leaving the other hurt, angry and perhaps vengeful. It’s all a recipe for disaster—and HR will have to manage the situation. You can punish them both, assuming they are merely co-workers. But if your rules aren’t very specific, you’ll have to be careful.

Different rules for pre- and post-birth FMLA leave?

06/17/2011
Q. We have a pregnant employee. She needs to take time off for medical appointments and perhaps complications. She then wants to take FMLA leave for birth and bonding. Should we require two separate medical certifications? And should we count all the medical appointments related to pregnancy against her 12 weeks of FMLA leave?

What web resources can we use to make sure we are in compliance with I-9 rules?

06/16/2011
Q. Our company needs guidance on keeping up with our obligations with regard to employment eligibility. What resources are available?

Can we require ‘English-only’ at work? Foreign-language chatter is affecting morale

06/16/2011
Q. Some of our employees speak to each other in their native language. We are worried that some workers will feel excluded. To boost employee morale, we would like to institute a policy prohibiting our workers from speaking any language other than English during the workday. Is such a policy legal?

Supreme Court upholds Arizona immigration law, backs E-Verify

06/16/2011
The U.S. Supreme Court has concluded that federal immigration law does not pre-empt or invalidate an Arizona law that subjects Arizona employers to sanctions for knowingly or intentionally employing unauthorized workers and requiring them to use the federal government’s E-Verify online employment eligibility verification system.

Sex harassment, retaliation cost gourmet company $535K

06/16/2011
Monterey Gourmet Foods, a Salinas specialty foods maker, will pay $535,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit alleging a supervisor sexually har­assed workers, who were fired after they complained.

Cal/OSHA puts heat on contractor after flash fire injures welder

06/16/2011
The California Division of Occu­pa­tional Safety and Health has fined a public works contractor more than $235,000—and threatened to put it out of business and criminally prosecute executives—after a welder suffered severe burns in a workplace flash fire.