• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

Texas health care firms sued for health-related firings

10/31/2011
Workers at two Texas health care companies are suing, alleging in separate lawsuits that their employers discriminated against them because of health-related issues. One suit claims pregnancy discrimination and FMLA interference, while the other says a worker was fired just before she was scheduled to undergo a costly surgical procedure.

USERRA: Handling pay, benefits for returning service members

10/31/2011

The end of U.S. military combat operations in Iraq means that more “citizen soldiers” will be returning to the civilian workforce. That makes it critical for HR professionals to understand USERRA, the federal law that protects the employment rights of military reservists and National Guard troops. Here’s a primer.

‘Ministerial exception’ applies to music director

10/31/2011
If yours is a religious organization, many employment discrimination laws may not apply to some employees who perform “ministerial” work.

Expect union reps to aggressively push grievances

10/31/2011
Is your workforce unionized? Then expect union reps to push grievances aggressively, especially if they involve possible racial issues. That’s because more employees are suing unions over timid representation.

Even if jobs seem quite similar, feel free to use different hiring criteria

10/31/2011
Employers sometimes have several similar jobs that require almost identical skills, certificates or training. But that doesn’t mean that all these positions can’t have different hiring requirements. Just make sure you can justify the differences.

When good performer is suddenly disciplined, consider that a red flag for retaliation

10/31/2011
Before authorizing a transfer, demotion or other adverse action based on poor performance, make sure you check the employee’s file. That’s especially true if the em­­ployee (or someone closely associated with the employee) has recently filed an EEOC complaint or lawsuit or other­wise engaged in protected activity.

With no explanation for firing, man files reverse-bias lawsuit

10/31/2011
A white man who was fired from his management position at a McKinney manufacturer is suing his former employer for reverse discrimination, claiming he was let go to clear the way for a black employee to take the job.

Innuendo alone doesn’t amount to harassment

10/31/2011
Generally, anti-discrimination laws are designed to punish egregious offenses rather than rude or inconsiderate behavior. That’s good news for employers dealing with isolated, sexually suggestive comments or behavior.

Safety first if alleged sex offender applies

10/31/2011
An employer that knows an applicant has been accused of sexual harassment or abuse can use that as grounds for refusing to hire. That’s true even if the applicant was never found criminally guilty or lost a lawsuit based on the allegations.

Solving for the unknown: No duty to accommodate disability that employee never revealed

10/31/2011
Some disabled employees never tell employers about their con­­ditions—even if their disability could affect performance. And of course you know you shouldn’t treat employees as disabled unless they claim a disability. But what if you fire someone for poor performance?