• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

Good news: EEOC doesn’t have the last word in deciding discrimination cases

10/31/2011

Here’s a bit of good news for employers on the losing end of an EEOC determination that an employee’s discrimination complaint has merit: That determination isn’t the final word—and it doesn’t carry much weight in court. The employee won’t be able to use the determination to prove bias.

You can discipline for email abuse–just don’t thwart ‘concerted’ or ‘protected’ activity

10/31/2011
As soon as employers started equipping employees with email accounts and a list of company email addresses, things started getting complicated. You can punish employees for many email attack campaigns—as long as you first make sure the content doesn’t qualify as concerted or protected activity.

Company, man with dreadlocks settle after jury deadlocks

10/31/2011
Lawrence Transportation has reached a settlement with a job applicant whom it refused to hire unless he cut off his dreadlocks. In addition to an undisclosed payment, the company agreed to implement and enforce policies banning religious discrimination and provide anti-­discrimination training to all employees.

Court: Apply first, then sue for discrimination

10/31/2011
If you want a job, you have to apply for it. If you want a promotion, you have to apply for it. If you want to sue an employer for discrimination in hiring or promotions, you probably should have applied, too, right?

Don’t sweat small stuff–you won’t lose in court

10/31/2011

Some employees expect the workplace to be a perfect place, free of all strife and disharmony. Too bad that’s an unrealistic standard. Employees have to develop some degree of tolerance for slights and inconveniences. And even if callous supervisors and co-workers treat sensitive souls badly, that doesn’t mean discrimination is to blame.

Keep the lawsuit clock on your side: Make sure workers know exact date of actions

10/31/2011
Employees have only a short period of time to file their initial dis­crimi­na­tion claims. The clock starts ticking as soon as the employee knows (or should have known) about some material, potentially adverse job change. That’s why you need to be absolutely clear to employees when you make a job change—and note it in your files.

NLRB: You may discipline for many employee online postings

10/27/2011
Treading carefully on today’s uncertain social media terrain, many employers might hesitate to punish employees for posting workplace comments online. But the National Labor Relations Board recently found in several scenarios that employers didn’t violate the National Labor Relations Act when they terminated or disciplined the employees.

In Pittsburgh, HIV test and pulled offer prompt ADA suit

10/27/2011
Pittsburgh-based Capital Healthcare Solutions faces a disability discrimination suit after it rescinded a job offer to an HIV-positive applicant. The EEOC sued on the applicant’s behalf, claiming Capital Healthcare rescinded its job offer solely on the basis of the man’s disability …

Loose lips lead to liability when word of alleged employee wrongdoing leaks out

10/27/2011

Pennsylvania allows lawsuits for portraying someone in a false light. For employers, that means you can be sued for publicizing information relating to discipline that turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, it makes sense to discuss discipline only with those who have a need to know.

Grocer, baker, Sabbath-taker embroiled

10/27/2011
A Dauphin County man who delivered Tastykakes to Giant Food stores is suing both the Tasty Baking Co. and the grocery store chain for religious discrimination after his contract was terminated. But Giant says it had no relationship with the deliveryman and wants to be removed from the suit.