• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

Suing over tip pools may end in California Supreme Court

05/15/2009

Employees who believe their employers may be forcing them to participate in a tip pool and may be diverting part of the tips to owners or managers who aren’t entitled to them may or may not have a right to sue on their own behalf.

Court rules some arbitration agreements are enforceable

05/15/2009

Employers sometimes can’t get arbitration agreements to stick in California. Now an appellate court has finally upheld such an agreement.

Judge rejects class-action bid in San Diego taxi case

05/15/2009

Judge Charles Hayes of the California Superior Court for the County of San Diego recently denied class certification to a group of taxi drivers who claimed they were improperly classified as independent contractors rather than employees.

Judge approves $8 million settlement in UPS case

05/15/2009

A federal judge recently approved an $8 million settlement between UPS and approximately 38,000 current and former California employees. The workers alleged the company failed to provide meal and rest breaks and did not pay terminated employees their wages on a timely basis.

Law firm WARN Act suit gets class-action status

05/15/2009

A federal judge recently certified two classes of workers in a suit accusing the law firm Thelen, LLP, of firing them without notice. Also certified were three subclasses of workers alleging that the defunct law firm failed to compensate them for vacation time.

What should we do when caregiver leave overlaps with family leave?

05/15/2009

Q. One of our employees recently went on military caregiver leave to take care of her injured husband. She is also expected to give birth in the coming weeks. Is she entitled to 12 weeks of leave under the FMLA in addition to her 26 weeks of caregiver leave?

Avoid shifting explanations for termination

05/13/2009

One of the worst things you can do after you terminate an employee is change the reason for ending the employment relationship. Instead, decide on a defensible rationale—a performance problem or rule violation, for example, or perhaps a business downturn—and document that decision and all the supporting evidence.

Don’t let diagnosis alone determine disability

05/13/2009

Here’s a common mistake that even the most experienced HR pro could make: An employee submits an ADA reasonable accommodations request that lists a serious-sounding condition as the disability that should be accommodated. Without further investigation, you start talking about possible accommodations. If that’s your approach, you’re missing out on an opportunity to delve deeper into whether the employee is, in fact, disabled under the ADA.

Firing Guard or Reserve member? Better show you would have taken action despite service

05/13/2009

Members of the military have greater on-the-job protection than many other employees—including the right to return to their former jobs following a period of active-duty service. They also have the right not to be terminated or otherwise punished for being part of the armed services and taking military leave.

Settling case? Prevent a second lawsuit by including promise not to reapply

05/13/2009

When you settle a lawsuit involving discrimination or some other employment matter, you typically want that to be the end of it. But what if the former employee applies for an open position? Avoid a second lawsuit by including a condition in the settlement that bars the employee from ever seeking employment with the company again.