• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Have the supervisor or manager who did the hiring be the one to handle the firing

03/06/2009

Here’s a simple way to prevent lawsuits when you have to fire a recently hired employee: Direct the person who hired the employee to also do the firing. If the employee belongs to a protected class, courts will conclude that the termination wasn’t discriminatory. Otherwise, why would the employee have been hired in the first place?

Courts losing patience with frivolous suits—and asking failed litigants to pay up

03/06/2009

There’s a silver lining to the rising number of employment lawsuits: Courts are losing patience with applicants, employees and former employees who file discrimination lawsuits that have no basis in reality. Recently, the 6th Circuit approved sanctions against such employees and their attorneys.

No separate Ohio wrongful-discharge claim for disability discrimination

03/06/2009

A federal court has ruled that Ohio employees who want to sue for disability discrimination can’t add on an additional claim of wrongful discharge under the so-called public policy of the state of Ohio. Employees have to use the federal ADA and the state disability discrimination statute instead.

Employees who don’t apply for promotions can’t sue

03/06/2009

Here’s a good reason to have a clear process for posting promotions and explaining that process to all employees: If an employee doesn’t use the process to apply, she can’t sue for failure to promote.

Keep hiring documents to guard against discrimination claims

03/06/2009

Now that Congress has enacted the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, it is more important than ever for employers to keep applications and other supporting documents as proof that they set wages fairly and without regard to gender.

Wal-Mart settles drivers’ race bias suit for $17.5 million

03/06/2009

Wal-Mart wasn’t wearing its smiley face when it agreed to pay a class of African-American truck driver applicants $17.5 million in a race discrimination suit. The drivers alleged Wal-Mart failed to hire and promote black drivers in proportion to the number who applied.

Associational discrimination: How close is close enough?

03/06/2009

Last year, in Thompson v. North Am. Stainless, the 6th Circuit recognized a claim under Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision for associational retaliation: “Title VII prohibit[s] employers from taking retaliatory action against employees not directly involved in protected activity, but who are so closely related to or associated with” employees who engage in protected activity. I remain critical of this standard because it leaves open the issue of how close is close enough.

Act quickly once you verify harassment

03/03/2009

When an employee has sexually harassed a co-worker, employers can avoid liability by acting fast to fix the situation as soon as they learn about it. General rules: If an employee complains, investigate promptly. If the alleged harasser confesses, immediately take steps to end any further harassment.

Is national origin in ‘eye of the beholder’?

03/03/2009

Employees can sue if they believe they have been discriminated against based on their national origin. But what if the employee’s family has been in the United States for generations, and she speaks without any discernable accent or speech pattern common to another nationality and looks all-American? Can she still claim national-origin discrimination?

Don’t be fooled: ‘Quit or be fired’ won’t stop employee from filing lawsuit

03/03/2009

Some companies mistakenly believe that offering an employee the option of quitting or being fired can save them from a later lawsuit. That isn’t always the case even if the employee decides to resign. In fact, an employee who quits to avoid being fired may have been “constructively discharged” and can still sue …