• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Courts to employees who bring meritless suits: Pay up!

04/07/2009

Nothing is more frustrating than having to spend time and money defending a frivolous lawsuit. But courts are becoming just as frustrated as employers, and are increasingly assessing costs against employees who lose their lawsuits. You can’t get your time back, but at least you can recover some of your money.

Texas anti-bias agency pays $900,000—for retaliation

04/07/2009

A jury recently awarded $900,000 to a former employee of the Texas Commission on Human Rights, which is responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, for firing her in retaliation for complaining about discrimination against the agency’s own employees.

Expect ‘lawsuit tsunami’ in wake of Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

04/07/2009

On Jan. 29, President Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which may be the most important change in anti-discrimination laws in decades. It applies to all pending compensation-related lawsuits, but limits back pay to two years. Employers can look ahead to many years of legal wrangling over the interpretation of the seven key words of the act: “a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice.”

‘Sensitive’ worker? Don’t sweat small stuff

04/02/2009

Workplace survival can require a thick skin. Some employees are just too sensitive to what co-workers say, assuming that every overheard comment is directed at them or meant to offend them in some way. The fact of the matter is that even a few incidents that border on harassment or religious intolerance aren’t enough to trigger a successful lawsuit.

On race, the customer isn’t always right

04/02/2009

When it comes to whom you employ, pay no attention to your customers’ preferences if they lead you to make illegal decisions. Simply put, employers can’t consider what race or ethnicity their customers or clients would prefer when making hiring decisions. That would be discrimination.

Investigate and—if appropriate—punish fast following claims of hostile work environment

04/02/2009

Always investigate a co-worker harassment claim right away. If you find a problem, fix it immediately. A rule of thumb: If co-workers say things that most people would find inappropriate, chances are the terms really are offensive—and likely to create legal liability. Most common slang for race or ethnicity is likely to cause trouble.

Settled discrimination case? Be prepared to show you’re complying with terms

04/02/2009

If you’ve agreed to settle a discrimination claim, here are some steps that prove you’re serious about maintaining a discrimination-free workplace. Taking these steps can short-circuit efforts to hold you in contempt of court for not doing enough to prevent further problems.

Track discipline to counter claims of discrimination

04/02/2009

Make sure everyone on your HR staff knows about every disciplinary action. Track who is disciplined and for what reasons. Use that data to do a self-audit. You’re looking to see whether members of a protected class are being punished more severely than others.

Proposed N.Y. law would stymie credit checks on job applicants

04/02/2009

The New York State Legislature is considering restricting employers’ ability to check job applicants’ credit. Critics of pre-employment credit checks have noted that the economic downturn has forced many people to miss payments, and that the practice may unreasonably rule out large numbers of applicants.

Assessing witness credibility in workplace investigations

04/02/2009

During a workplace investigation, there are a number of practical steps that you, as an HR investigator, can take to improve the reliability and objectivity of your witness credibility assessments. Four factors are critical to assessing witness credibility: demeanor, consistency, chronology, and past history and motivations.