• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Worker quits in a huff and sues? Court: Employers need chance to fix problem

09/24/2010

Courts are starting to toss out lawsuits brought by employees who quit at the first sign of trouble without at least trying to work out a solution. Judges aren’t as willing as they were in the past to accept quitting as just another form of termination. Instead, they seem to be telling employees they need to give their employers a chance to fix problems before resorting to litigation.

Depression no excuse for missed EEO deadlines

09/24/2010

Federal government employees have tight deadlines for initiating discrimination complaints. In most cases, they must do so within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory act. Miss the deadline, and the case ends. But there are exceptions. For example, if an employee is severely incapacitated, she may be exempted from contacting an agency’s EEO office within 45 days. However, as a recent case shows, mere suffering from depression and anxiety isn’t enough to extend the deadline.

Don’t assume temps are independent contractors

09/24/2010
Some temporary agencies and employee-leasing firms sell their clients on the idea that temp workers won’t be employees of the client. Instead, they will be either independent contractors or employees of the temp agency. Those claims may not hold up in court, because North Carolina has strict tests for who is an employee and who isn’t.

Doylestown bans discrimination on basis of sexual orientation

09/24/2010
The Doylestown Borough Council has unanimously passed an ordinance banning discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations based on sexual orientation. The law protects lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual people from discrimination.

Judge approves disability bias class action against SSA

09/24/2010

An EEOC administrative law judge in Philadelphia has agreed to allow a group of disabled workers to bring a class-action discrimination lawsuit against their employer, the Social Security Administration. The suit alleges the SSA has created a glass ceiling for employees with certain targeted disabilities.

Duquesne Law revisits the lawsuit that wouldn’t die

09/24/2010
Some employee lawsuits just won’t go away. Duquesne Law School in Pittsburgh is still embroiled in litigation it thought had ended three years ago—because a savvy employee has added new claims to an old sex discrimination and sexual harassment lawsuit.

Failure to interview for promotion can be retaliation

09/24/2010
Employees who complain about alleged discrimination and experience retaliation can sue even if it turns out they don’t have a valid discrimination case. And almost anything that would dissuade someone from complaining in the first place is retaliation.

Watch out when firing for breaking unwritten rule

09/24/2010
Before you approve a termination based on an employee’s apparent violation of an unwritten rule, decide whether the reason can stand up to scrutiny.

Beware! Your ‘neutral’ rule may invite lawsuit

09/24/2010
So your work rules are fair and neutral. There’s no way employees belonging to a protected class would sue you, alleging the rule has a disparate impact. Guess again—it happens. Consider this recent case, which has resulted in years of legal wrangling.

Ensure fair distribution of work opportunities

09/24/2010

Does your company employ salespeople who are responsible for meeting certain benchmark goals? If so, be sure you have some way to check that everyone competes on an even footing. That includes ensuring that things like territories and leads are distributed in a way that doesn’t favor members of one group at the expense of another.