• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Carefully track every accommodation request

04/20/2011
Here’s a tip that can save your organization from a large disability discrimination verdict sometime down the line: Whenever an employee discloses that he may need some sort of disability accommodation, make sure you carefully document the request and your response.

Supreme Court’s big retaliation ruling already a factor

04/19/2011
When the U.S. Supreme Court speaks, employers better listen! The ink was barely dry on the High Court’s retaliation decision in Thompson v. North American Stainless when a federal judge considering a Florida case expanded the opinion’s reach.

Employing Minors: Federal Law & Legal Best Practices

04/19/2011
Login Email Address Password I forgot my password To continue reading this page, become an HR Specialist Premium Plus member today! Your subscription includes: Ask the Attorney: Answers to your HR legal questions Compliance Guidance: Access to 7,000 HR news articles, updated daily, sorted by state State-by-State: Summaries of HR laws in all 50 states […]

Showing sympathy doesn’t create ADA liability

04/18/2011
Employees who turn out not to meet the definition of “disabled” can still sue for disability discrimination based on their employer’s perception that they are disabled. That doesn’t mean, however, that supervisors can’t express concern and sympathy when an employee reveals a problem. Nor does it mean they can’t offer accommodations at that point or explain what types of leave are available.

Have a progressive-discipline system? Great! But reserve right to fire immediately if necessary

04/15/2011
Many employers have a progressive-discipline system. Usually that’s good. But sometimes you may need to deviate from the disciplinary script. To keep your options open, make sure you explain that the disciplinary system is for guidance only, and that you reserve the right to apply the rules based on the individual circumstances of a particular case.

Family that harasses together… gets to go to court together

04/15/2011
DiMare Ruskin, an agricultural products company, faces sexual harassment charges stemming from the alleged actions of father and son supervisors at the company’s Immokalee plant.

She’s not our employee! Are we liable for subcontractor harassment?

04/15/2011
Q. We recently received a complaint of harassment from an employee of one of the contractors we hire to do some work around our facility. I know, of course, all about our duty to prevent and stop sexual and other kinds of harassment of our own employees. But we don’t have a duty to do the same for the employees of another company, do we?

Beware state law that could cost you millions

04/15/2011
If you need additional incentives to stop sexual harassment in the workplace, how’s this for a motivator: A court has ruled that employees who endure gender-related violence can now sue their employers for damages under the Illinois Gender Violence Act.

Don’t fear lawsuit after mere lateral transfer

04/15/2011
You have lots of latitude to decide the shifts and locations to which employees are assigned. As long as there are no obvious flags (like only assigning members of a particular protected class to the night shift), courts likely won’t interfere with your management decisions.

Ocala firm pays for tolerating same-sex harassment

04/15/2011
Prestige Home Centers, a mobile-home manufacturer based in Ocala, has agreed to pay $79,000 to several male employees who claimed a male supervisor at the company’s Lake City facility verbally harassed, groped and propositioned them.