• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

San Francisco janitors, former employer settle race-bias suit

01/20/2012
A group of seven San Francisco janitors will split $180,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit that alleged ABM Industries discriminated against His­­panic employees and retaliated against those who filed discrimination complaints with the EEOC.

Boss recommends firing minority worker? Check the record for hidden supervisor bias

01/20/2012
Some supervisors may be secretly biased against members of a particular protected class—something that may be hard to tell until it’s too late. And if a bigoted boss decides to get rid of a subordinate by telling HR the employee is a poor per­­former, rubber-stamping that decision can mean losing a discrimination lawsuit.

Immunize hiring processes against bias suits

01/20/2012
With so many qualified people applying for jobs these days, it’s much harder for unsuccessful candidates to win hiring discrimination lawsuits. That’s because em­­ployers choosing the best candidate often zero in on one bit of experience or a skill that stands out from other applicants. It’s hard to argue that that’s discrimination.

Gospel truth: You must accommodate employees’ religious needs

01/18/2012
Charges of religious discrimination filed with the EEOC have increased steadily in recent years. One recent case provides a powerful reminder that employers are obligated to reasonably accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs and practices.

Feds rock Brunswick’s boat, charge gender discrimination

01/18/2012
The federal Office of Federal Con­­tract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) is suing a subsidiary of Lake Forest-based Brunswick Corp.—Lund Boat Co., located in Minnesota— alleging it discriminates against women in its hiring practices.

Notice date–not workers’ last day–starts lawsuit calendar

01/18/2012
Employees don’t have forever to sue for wrongful termination—and the clock may start ticking even before their last day on the job. That can mean all the difference in court.

No requirement to break up love triangles–but be prepared for workplace violence

01/18/2012

When romance blooms at work, trouble may lurk not far behind. That’s especially true when co-workers fight over the same love interest. A spurned employee may be out to get her rival, leading to all sorts of conflict. Fortunately, this isn’t the sort of thing that employers have to intervene in—as long as there’s no workplace violence.

Inability to perform a specific job doesn’t mean employee is disabled

01/18/2012

Some employees seem to believe that every medical problem is a disability that requires accommodation. That’s not true. Employees aren’t disabled unless their condition substantially limits a major life function. If the only effect is an inability to perform a specific job—not a class of jobs—the employee isn’t disabled and doesn’t have to be accommodated.

Following EEOC victory, carefully consider conditions you include in last-chance agreements

01/18/2012

In a significant legal victory, the EEOC has persuaded a federal court to limit what employers can in­­clude in so-called last-chance agreements. The court concluded that the EEOC was right when it argued that agreements threatening retaliation are illegal …

Aggressively stamp out workplace bawdiness

01/18/2012

Employers that don’t have a squeaky-clean, sex- and innuendo-free workplace may end up spending big bucks defending against sexual harassment charges. That means you need an aggressive program that bans all forms of sexual behavior and banter at work.