• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Chauffeurs get $130k each for Saudi snub

03/11/2016
When Saudi Prince Abdul-Rahman bin Abdul-Aziz traveled to the Mayo Clinic in 2010 for treatment, he arrived with a large entourage.

Native American casino isn’t Title VII employer

03/11/2016
When is an employer not an employer under Title VII?

Employer gets to set harassment standards

03/11/2016
Employers have the right to set reasonable behavioral expectations for employees. This, of course, includes expecting that employees won’t sexually, or otherwise, harass employees. Feel free to make your anti-harassment policy as strict as you want.

Court: Constant racial slurs plus unequal treatment warrant a trial

03/11/2016
A few isolated comments don’t usually form the basis for challenging an otherwise legitimate employment decision.

Stray comments alone don’t prove bias

03/11/2016
A few stray comments in the workplace aren’t enough to taint every employment action. The comments have to be somehow tied to the employment action.

Three new employment law issues affect New York employers

03/09/2016
This month, we bring you a compendium of new laws, ordinances and regulations affecting New York employers.

New York expands protection for transgender workers

03/09/2016
The New York Division of Human Rights has adopted new regulations expanding the definition of “sex” under the state’s Human Rights Law to include gender identity and transgender status.

Language doesn’t create protected class

03/09/2016
An employee who claimed he was singled out and discriminated against because he did not speak a particular language has lost his discrimination case.

Atheist entitled to ‘religious’ accommodation

03/09/2016
Employers have to reasonably accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs and practices. But what if the worker happens to be an atheist?

EEOC files first Title VII gay-bias lawsuits

03/04/2016
The EEOC has filed its first two lawsuits against private-sector employers based on the contention that bias against gay people is a form of sex discrimination.