• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

ADA

Develop procedures for breaks that accommodate disabilities

08/12/2008
Sometimes, employees with disabilities may need additional breaks as reasonable accommodations. But you don’t have to leave the timing or duration of the breaks entirely to the employee. If you do, it will be hard to tell whether the employee is taking a legitimate and necessary accommodations break or simply taking advantage of additional freedom. And that can lead to litigation …

Before assuming you must accommodate under ADA, evaluate disability and ability

08/11/2008
The ADA requires employers to reasonably accommodate disabled applicants and employees within a tight set of parameters. But an employer only has to offer reasonable accommodations that allow a disabled employee to perform the essential functions of a job. Employers don’t have to create new jobs or restructure jobs to such an extent that essential functions are dropped …

May we terminate a disabled employee who can’t perform an essential function?

08/08/2008
Q. One of our employees was hired to a position that requires her to drive to customers’ offices. When we hired her, she reviewed and signed a job description that included a statement “that transportation was an essential function of her job.” Public transportation is not a realistic option. She recently received test results suggesting she might be suffering from multiple sclerosis. She provided a return-to-work slip indicating she would be able to return to work on a part-time basis but would not be able to drive or do heavy lifting. We told her we cannot accommodate her restrictions, but we provided a four-month leave of absence. Assuming she will not be able to drive when she returns, are we within our rights to discharge her? Are we going to violate her rights under the ADA or Michigan disability laws? …

ADA retaliation settlement gives officer promotion, pay

08/05/2008
Lance Lazoff, an officer with the Colorado Springs Police Department, will be promoted to sergeant with back pay and benefits to settle his retaliation lawsuit against the city. Lazoff alleged that, despite an exemplary service record, he was denied promotion to the rank of sergeant because of his vocal support for his wife’s claim under the ADA …

Colorado vs. federal law on discrimination

08/05/2008
Q. Our small Colorado business is growing, and soon we will have 15 employees on the payroll. How does that affect our exposure under employment laws? …

Beware! Now it’s even easier for disabled employees to sue

08/04/2008
A new federal appeals court case has made it easier for employees in the 5th Circuit to sue for disability discrimination. To prove disability discrimination, employees need to show only that the disability was a “motivating factor” in an employment decision, not the sole cause …

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act finally becomes law

08/04/2008
President Bush recently signed into law H.R. 493, also known as the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), which prohibits employers from using genetic tests or information to discriminate against applicants and employees …

Attendance policies: Control absenteeism without breaking the law

08/01/2008

For most employees, regular attendance is a key job function. But while you are free to set and enforce attendance rules, you must also comply with key federal laws, including the FMLA and the ADA.

 

Workers’ comp disability doesn’t mean automatic ADA coverage

07/25/2008
Employees receiving partial workers’ compensation benefits based on job-related injuries might think they are automatically entitled to reasonable accommodations under the ADA, too. But that’s simply not true. In fact, the ADA requires an individualized assessment. Receiving workers’ compensation isn’t enough …

Warn managers about personal liability

07/25/2008
One way to get the attention of your managers and supervisors is to warn them that they may be personally liable for breaking some state or federal laws. For example, because the definition of “employer” in the FMLA and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is quite broad, some supervisors and managers have been held personally responsible. And the same is true for some job-related injuries. …