• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

ADA

So an employee tells you she’s seriously ill … now what?

05/27/2009

It’s sad enough when an employee becomes seriously ill. What makes it tougher is that work doesn’t stop. Deadlines remain, customers need service and paperwork piles up. Mistakes can mean not only hurt feelings but also potential legal liability problems. Here are four ways supervisors and HR can handle such situations with tact and legal skill.

Offering help at interview doesn’t mean you regard applicant as disabled

05/27/2009

As an employer, you’ve probably learned to ignore apparent disabilities because you could end up violating the ADA if you inquire about disabilities. That doesn’t mean, however, that you’ll run afoul of the law if you do something as simple as offering assistance to an applicant who is having trouble navigating stairs or getting on the elevator.

Proceed with caution when making health-related inquiries

05/27/2009

Employers enter a legal minefield when they inquire about the health of applicants or employees. State and federal laws—such as the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA), the ADA and the FMLA—overlap, and any misstep can cause a litigation explosion.

What should we do? We’re afraid our diabetic employee is a danger to herself and others

05/27/2009

Q. One of our employees, who has diabetes, is on the road a lot tending to patients in their homes. We’ve heard that she is having trouble seeing patient charts and difficulty pricking patients’ fingers for tests. What should we do?

Supreme Court nominee Sotomayor brings balanced employment law perspective

05/26/2009

Experts say Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, will bring a pragmatic perspective on employment law to the High Court if she is confirmed. Here’s a rundown of employment law decisions she has rendered from her current seat on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Don’t let diagnosis alone determine disability

05/13/2009

Here’s a common mistake that even the most experienced HR pro could make: An employee submits an ADA reasonable accommodations request that lists a serious-sounding condition as the disability that should be accommodated. Without further investigation, you start talking about possible accommodations. If that’s your approach, you’re missing out on an opportunity to delve deeper into whether the employee is, in fact, disabled under the ADA.

You can discharge if there’s no way to tell when employee will return to work

05/13/2009

Employers don’t have to provide a disabled employee with an indefinite leave of absence when the employee has a medical emergency and doesn’t know how long it will take to return. As long as the employee isn’t covered by the FMLA (in which case, she is entitled to 12 unpaid weeks of leave), you can terminate the employee without violating the ADA.

ADA: Consider what’s a ‘major life activity’

05/11/2009

Employees who cannot drive a motor vehicle due to a physical or psychological reason don’t automatically qualify for ADA protection. That’s because driving is not a major life activity. Therefore, an employee who claims that she panics when she has to get behind the wheel isn’t entitled to transfer to a nondriving position as a reasonable accommodation.

Curiosity about co-worker’s accommodation not harassment

05/11/2009

Even though employers must maintain confidentiality when a disabled employee receives ADA accommodations, other employees are bound to notice. For example, they might ask how the employee got a good schedule or even if she has a disability. That doesn’t amount to disability harassment.

EEOC sues rehab center for failure to accommodate

05/11/2009

The EEOC has filed a federal lawsuit accusing the Florida Institute for Neurological Rehabilitation of violating the ADA when it refused to accommodate a disabled employee’s request for training assistance.