• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retirement

Was it forced retirement or just a resignation?

06/02/2016
An employee facing the prospect of being demoted, transferred or having to take on new duties may consider retiring instead.

When will baby boomers retire?

05/23/2016
Boomers apparently are ready to work as long as possible.

Staten Island retirement plan to get a fiduciary

05/09/2016
The U.S. Department of Labor has asked a federal court to allow it to appoint a fiduciary for the employee retirement fund at Lily Pond Nursing Home, formerly of Staten Island.

Your retirement benefits options defined

04/27/2016
It pays to understand your different retirement options.

DOL secures judgment against retirement plan fiduciary

04/22/2016
The U.S. Department of Labor has secured a judgment against a San Jose construction firm after an investigation revealed that employee contributions to the company’s retirement plan were never deposited.

New fiduciary standard could affect 401(k) rollovers

04/14/2016
The DOL has issued a final rule requiring retirement advisors to tell clients if they receive commissions for recommendations.

Snapshot: Huge gap between retirement ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’

03/23/2016
How much do you have save for your retirement?

Report: 401(k)s leave most unprepared to retire

03/18/2016
The shift from pensions to 401(k)plans has failed most American workers and disproportionately harmed disadvantaged groups, according to a new report from the Economic Policy Institute think tank.

DOL sues to wind down old 401(k) in Eagan

02/12/2016
We’ve all seen those commercials asking if employees have left something behind at an old employer such as an old 401(k) plan. Well, if the U.S. Department of Labor allegations are true, Carr Freight Systems forgot about its plan as well.

Avoid age-bias risk when talking retirement

01/21/2016

Supervisors and HR walk a legal tightrope when discussing retirement plans with older workers. If it appears you’re pushing an employee out the door based on his age—or if you suddenly eliminate his position after discussing retirement—you’ll be setting yourself up for an age discrimination lawsuit.