Requiring English not automatically biased
For years, the EEOC has taken the position that rules requiring employees to speak only English at work are discriminatory unless the employer can justify the rule as a business necessity. But now a federal court has concluded that before making an employer justify the rule’s necessity, the affected worker has to show that the policy has a disparate impact on a protected group.
To continue reading this page, become an
HR Specialist Premium Plus member today!
HR Specialist Premium Plus member today!
Your subscription includes:
- Ask the Attorney: Answers to your HR legal questions
- Compliance Guidance: Access to 7,000 HR news articles, updated daily, sorted by state
- State-by-State: Summaries of HR laws in all 50 states
- Manager's Training Library: a treasure trove of printable training guides
- Memos to Managers for simple staff training
- The Hiring Toolkit: Job descriptions, interview questions & exemption tests for 200+ positions
- Webinar of the Week: Train instantly with recent recordings
- Sample Policies, Weekly Podcasts, Q&As and much, much more ...