Supreme Court: Check boss bias before discipline
It’s more important than ever now for HR professionals to independently check supervisors’ disciplinary recommendations to ensure that they have no ulterior motives. That’s because the U.S. Supreme Court, in a much-anticipated “cat’s paw” ruling, said that an employer can be found liable for the discriminatory intent of supervisors who influence—but don’t ultimately make—an adverse employment decision.
To continue reading this page, become an
HR Specialist Premium Plus member today!
HR Specialist Premium Plus member today!
Your subscription includes:
- Ask the Attorney: Answers to your HR legal questions
- Compliance Guidance: Access to 7,000 HR news articles, updated daily, sorted by state
- State-by-State: Summaries of HR laws in all 50 states
- Manager's Training Library: a treasure trove of printable training guides
- Memos to Managers for simple staff training
- The Hiring Toolkit: Job descriptions, interview questions & exemption tests for 200+ positions
- Webinar of the Week: Train instantly with recent recordings
- Sample Policies, Weekly Podcasts, Q&As and much, much more ...